casino onlinecapcut88pastigacor88slot thailandslot pulsaslot pulsaslot gacor hari inislot pulsaslot danaslot gacor hari inislot gacor gampang menangslot gacor maxwinslot pulsaslot pulsaslot777slot 2025slot terbaik 2025slot terpercaya 2025slot pulsaslot gacor terbaikslot gacor hari inislot danaslot gacor terpercayaagen slot gacorslot gacorslot gacor viralslot pulsaslot gacor maxwinslot danasitus slot gacor
SeratuS Tujuh Puluh Satu Organisasi dari 40 negara meminta Pemerintah Jepang Untuk Menghentikan Penggunaan Dana Publik Membiayai PLTU Batubara Cirebon dan Indramayu, Jawa Barat | WALHI

SeratuS Tujuh Puluh Satu Organisasi dari 40 negara meminta Pemerintah Jepang Untuk Menghentikan Penggunaan Dana Publik Membiayai PLTU Batubara Cirebon dan Indramayu, Jawa Barat

Pada tanggal 18 mei 2019 petisi internasional yang ditandatangani oleh 171 NGO dari 40 negara diajukan kepada pemerintah Jepang, isinya meminta JBIC dan JICA tidak memberikan pendanaan publik kepada ekspansi PLTU Batubara Cirebon (1000MW) dan PLTU Batubara Indramayu(1000MW) yang berlokasi di Jawa Barat Indonesia. Petisi ini diserahkan langsung oleh perwakilan WALHI(Wahana Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia) kepada Kementrian Keuangan Jepang, Kementrian Luar Negeri Jepang, JBIC dan JICA. Perwakilan Walhi menyerahkan selama kunjungan mereka ke Tokyo Jepang pada tanggal 15 sampai 18 mei 2018. Walhi mendampingi masyarakat lokal di Cirebon dan Indramayu yang terdampak oleh kedua PLTU yang sudah beroperasi saat ini. Komunitas di dua lokasi tersebut mengkhawatikan dampak yang lebih besar jika kedua PLTU tersebut ditambah kapasitasnya. Perlawan komunitas selama ini dilakukan baik aksi langsung maupun melalui gugatan hukum. Gugatan hukum yang sempat dimenangkan warga ditelikung oleh akrobat hukum yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah untuk menerbitkan kembali izin lingkungan yang dibatalkan oleh pengadilan. Perlawanan Komunitas juga menghadapi kriminalisasi, intimidasi dan pelanggaran HAM. Saat ini dua kasus tersebut sedang dalam tahap kasasi(Indramayu) dan banding(penerbitan kembali izin pltu cirebon ). Sementara untuk kriminalisasi masih terdapat 4 warga Indramayu yang ditahan dirutan Indramayu dan 3 orang yang masih dalam status tersangka untuk kasus yang mengada-ada(tuduhan pengibaran bendera terbalik). Jepang selama ini selalu dikritik karena tetap mendanai PLTU Batubara yang emisinya paling kotor diantara sumber energi lainnya. Komitmen jepang untuk menghentikan emisi karbon dipertanyakan karena tetap membiayai energi kotor. Nara Hubung Dwi Sawung Manager Kampanye Energi dan Perkotaan WALHI +628156104606 sawung@wp_walhi.local May 18, 2018 Mr. Shinzo Abe, Prime Minister Mr. Taro Aso, Minister of Finance Mr. Taro Kono, Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr. Hiroshige Seko, Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry Mr. Masaharu Nakagawa, Minister of Environment Mr. Akira Kondoh, Governor, Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC) Mr. Shinichi Kitaoka, President, Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Mr. Kazuhiko Bando, Chairman and CEO, Nippon Export and Investment Insurance (NEXI) Re: Japanese Government Must Stop Financing the Cirebon and Indramayu Coal-fired Power Plants, West Java, Indonesia Dear Mr. Abe, Mr. Aso, Mr. Kono, Mr. Seko, Mr. Nakagawa, Mr. Kondoh, Mr. Kitaoka, and Mr. Bando: The undersigned groups from across the world are writing to express our strong support for the Indonesian community in Cirebon and Indramayu, West Java, who have never given up and have kept their efforts to protect their life and environment from the Japan-backed dirty coal projects.

The Japanese government must respect the community’s continuous opposition shown in various ways, including protest actions and lawsuits, despite serious human rights violations against them. We call on JBIC and NEXI not to support the expansion of the Cirebon coal-fired power plant (1,000 MW) anymore, and JICA to reject the loan for the expansion of the Indramayu coal-fired power plant (1,000 MW). We have been deeply concerned about the role that Japan has been playing in pushing through the construction of new coal-fired power plants abroad, even after the Paris Agreement was adopted in 2015 and entered into force in 2016. The discrepancy between rapid de-carbonization of the energy sector globally and Japan’s policy to continuously export “efficient” coal-fired power plants is stark. For example, Japanese public financiers, namely JBIC and NEXI, and Japanese commercial banks decided last year to support the re-expansion of the Tanjung Jati B coal-fired power plants (2,000 MW) in Central Java, and the said expansion of the Cirebon coal-fired power plant, after French commercial banks withdrew from the bank consortiums for both projects in line with their commitments to reduce coal finance. This has been followed by the just recent decision of JBIC and Japanese commercial banks to finance the expansion of the Nghi Son coal-fired power plants (1,200 MW) in Thanh Hoa, Vietnam, last April, after British commercial bank’s withdrawal from the bank consortium. Reportedly, Japan is planning to get involved in more new coal-fired power plants abroad, including projects in Myanmar, the Philippines, Mongolia, Bangladesh, Botswana, South Africa, and Egypt, aside from Indonesia and Vietnam. Such funding of Japanese public and private banks for coal projects undermines global efforts to dramatically decrease carbon emissions in line with the Paris Agreement. To fulfill the Paris Agreement long-term temperature goal, no new coal plants can be built. Japan as a signatory to the Paris Agreement must be responsible by changing its course immediately. Otherwise, Japan will likely face more severe international criticism. The said coal plant projects in Cirebon and Indramayu have drawn international attention due to the continuously strong opposition of the local people.

The affected residents have raised environmental and social concerns, such as adverse impacts on livelihood and health. In addition, the violations against the environmental and social guidelines (the Guidelines), which JBIC, NEXI and JICA own respectively, have been pointed out as described below. Firstly, both projects entail legally fatal defects in their environmental permits. Each community filed administrative lawsuits, claiming that the permits for the projects were not appropriately issued by the local governments. The district court declared the cancellations of both environmental permits, respectively in April 2017 for the Cirebon case and in December 2017 for the Indramayu case. Despite these verdicts in favor of the community, their struggles through litigation are still continuing. The Cirebon community has made an appeal to the High Court, after the district court rejected their demand or the cancellation of the 2nd environmental permit this month, which was issued without the awareness of the local community in July 2017. The Indramayu community has also made an appeal to the Supreme Court, after the rejection of their demand in the High Court in April 2018. JBIC, NEXI, and JICA must not provide any support for both projects, unless and until the final court decisions are confirmed. If the cancelations of the environmental permits are confirmed by legal decision, it will become clear that the projects violate their own Guidelines, which require “compliance with environmental laws of the host country” and “the submission of environmental permit certificates.” It must be also heeded that the supporting lawyers’ team and NGOs for the community’s lawsuits are warning that the current situation indicates that laws and regulations to protect the environment are becoming a dead letter, giving in to the interests of development. Secondly, these ongoing legal cases are one of the clear forms showing the community’s continuous opposition against the said projects in Cirebon and Indramayu. It is obvious that no “social acceptability” for both projects has been secured, which the Guidelines require. Thirdly, appropriate and effective measures to improve or at least restore the livelihoods of local farmers and fishermen are absent. For example, fishing nets provided by the project proponent are not effective to restore the small-scale fishermen’s livelihood in Cirebon, but rather have divided the local community or society.

Likewise, livestock to be provided for the tenant farmers and daily farm labors will not replace the loss of farming land in Indramayu. Those programs are not the right solutions to the huge impact on the community’s livelihood. What the communities need are healthy coastal environments for fishing and fertile irrigated lands for farming. This is a clear violation of the Guidelines which stipulate that “The project proponents must make efforts to enable the people affected by the project to improve their standard of living, income opportunities, and production levels, or at least to restore them to pre-project levels.” Finally, human rights violations against the vocal community members must not be neglected. Especially, the ongoing criminalization in Indramayu is an alarming situation. In December 2017, a few community members were wrongfully arrested by the local police and are still under suspect status even after their release. The other community members, including one of the plaintiffs in the said lawsuit, have been put in jail since last April. These incidents could cause the chilling effect, or could prevent the community from freely express their opinion in Cirebon as well as Indramayu. It is highly concerned that both projects could not ensure “meaningful participation of the affected people,” which is required by the Guidelines. Last but not least, we would like to call your attention to the electricity reserve margins in the Java-Bali grid, which have already reached 32 percent surplus.

According to the most recent government report, this figure could maintain at 29 percent by 2027. The electricity demand in 2017 for the entire Indonesia was only increasing with 3.57 % and was not consistent with the rate of economic growth, both rates of which were also far below the planning assumption. It is highly questionable if both projects in Cirebon and Indramayu are necessary, at the cost of local life and environment as well as global climate. We again demand that the Japanese government does not provide any more support for the Cirebon and Indramayu coal-fired power plants. Japan must end its financing for coal projects and shift toward clean and sustainable renewable energy projects that will increase access to electricity without polluting local air and water or contributing to climate change. Cc: Mr. Fumiya Kokubu, President & CEO, Marubeni Corporation Mr. Yuji Kakimi, President, JERA Co., Inc. Mr. Koji Fujiwara, President & CEO, Mizuho Bank, Ltd. Mr. Makoto Takashima, President & CEO, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Mr. Kanetsugu Mike, President & CEO, MUFG Bank, Ltd. Mr. Sung-soo Eun, Chairman & President, The Export-Import Bank of Korea Mr. Ralph Hamers, CEO and chairman Executive Board, ING Group Mr. Yuichi Hirasawa, Director Corporate Clients, ING Wholesale Banking in Japan LIST OF SIGNATORIES surat ini ditandatangani 171 organisasi, termasuk organisasi internasional dan regional termasuk organisasi yang bekerja secara nasional di 40 negara.